Sunday, October 11, 2009

A Volley from the Canon, #66

PRAYER BOOK VS. PHOTOCOPY
It does get discouraging to note visitors to Episcopal worship, unused to participating in the liturgy, struggling with the prayer book and one or more hymnals. Some just blink doe-eyed at any suggestion to “turn to page___.” Page? Book? Read in church? Later, they say, “I’d never learn how to follow this service!” (And they haven’t even begun on the hymnal yet!) So, as a solution, we have the idea of printing the complete text for every Eucharist, including lessons, but containing only those prayers that will be used on the given day. It’s much easier, we think, more user-friendly, and especially more visitor-friendly. I’ve done it myself, and I admit there are those advantages. Even worship leaders experience a bit less confusion. It does “level the field” for new-comers—they have the same leaflet everyone else does, and the same ability to use it. And some of those who would not even pick up a book will actually use a pamphlet.

On the whole, though, I’ve come down on the side of sticking with the actual prayer book and hymnal themselves. Here’s why.

• It is a whole lot of trouble and takes a great deal of time to create a separate pamphlet for every week. That is a significant expenditure of personnel resources.
• It costs a lot of money to print that much material, too. All for—how many visitors per week?
• Word processing notwithstanding, the opportunity for errors increases. We once prayed for “Edmund, our Presiding Bishop” even after her name had become Katherine!
• The waste of paper is a bad message for the church to be sending. We should be modeling conservation, renewability and recycling.
• Experienced worshipers don’t need the booklets, and don’t use them. More waste.
• Even in this electronic world, there is something satisfying about holding an actual book in one’s hands.
• The opportunity to teach people how to use the book is lost, and learning to use the book also brings some understanding of how the liturgy fits together.
• Helping someone fathom the prayer book can be an opportunity for hospitality.
• The accomplishment of finally “getting it” can be a sign of fitting in.


No doubt, we do need to be sensitive to the way our prayer book can seem off-putting and alienating to Protestants among us in worship. We can do that by a smile at the right moment, a few words of encouragement, and an occasional short and impromptu lesson on the spot. Most importantly, we can keep our sense of humor, and let people know that we, too, were once BCP newbies—and they, too, can quickly become proficient in its use. Best of all, we take advantage of the opportunity to be verbally welcoming to a first-time worshiper, and maybe begin a long-term friendship. That way, we turn our handicap into a strength.

9 comments:

Donald K. Vinson said...

from Rick Rutledge...
I totally agree with your assessment of the "prayer book vrs photocopy" There is, however, another option which has been used in this and other Diocese. It is the use of a power point presentation projected on some easy to read screen. This eliminates the cost of printing yet still offers a "printed" prayer book service which all can follow and even makes the hymns easy to follow. It does require some techno savy, but would be a great ministry for the younger folks as they generally know power point and how to use it. It could be a way to include them more fully in the service.

Rick+

Donald K. Vinson said...

from Beth Hamrick...
At St. John's Charleston we have seasonal pamphlets. Even the tried and true members seem to enjoy the ease of their use. Those who have memorized the prayers still hold the booklets and sometimes peek at them to make sure they understand what they're saying.
Perhaps the time to teach about the BCP is a) in Sunday School or b) during adult catechism.
Now. Let's talk about the two versions of the Lord's Prayer....
Beth Hamrick

Donald K. Vinson said...

from Linda Comins...
If the power of PowerPoint is typically like that used at the recent Diocesan Convention (for showing the missing hymn verse and for the 2010 budget), then PowerPoint is totally useless in such a setting -- because no one could read the screen (unless, perhaps, they were standing directly in front of the screen).
Linda Comins

Donald K. Vinson said...

from Michael Roberts...
We at Mt. Zion keep it simple. A simple bulletin (attached). BCP page in right column and the Hymnal in the left column.
When a newbie arrives, it is an opportunity for a seasoned parishioner to lend a hand.
An Episcopalian promptly organizes the two books and bulletin, no help needed.
Visitors who fumble or looks around, needs a mentor. . . great opportunity.

Michael Roberts

Donald K. Vinson said...

from Becky Szabo...

At St. Clements, Canton, GA,
where our daughter worships, the 9 am "family service" projects everything on the wall so parents don't have to juggle books and babies. And it is well done (readable) for the most part. The computer person does need to stay alert!
Becky Szabo
Olde St. Johns, Colliers

Donald K. Vinson said...

from Cynthia Walter...
I think this is a question (Prayer Book vs. photocopy vs. Power Point vs. season-specific menu-style scripts with the changeable stuff in
inserts) is something every parish should approach intentionally and return to frequently to ask if whatever method they're using is working. I have come to believe that no one solution "fits all." I came to the diocese from a church that prepared full photo-copied scripts for each of the three Sunday services. The waste was monumental and the errors were legion. I imagine visitors did not feel overwhelmed however (when the typos didn't get in the way.) We use the prayer book at Lawrencefield, but it's very, very obvious here when someone is new or visiting, because we don't get visitors too often. When I see an unfamiliar face in the pews I take care to identify the page in the Prayer Book, and identify the Prayer Book as "the book with the big gold cross." We also have "FAQs about Holy Communion" on laminated cards in every pew, and our bulletin distinguishes between the /red/ prayer book
and the /blue/ hymnal. We are not married to the way we do things
now, however, and the time may come (and come soon!) when we use full scripts or even, God help us, projection. Who knows where the Holy Spirit may take us? But I pray we may be sensitive to the need to change, when it comes.
The Rev. Cynthia Byers Walter
Rector, Lawrencefield Parish Church, Wheeling

Donald K. Vinson said...

from Jason Beschinski...
As a techno savvy kinda guy (and I use the term loosely), I have mixed feelings about projection being used in liturgy. I have rarely seen it done well, where the imagery or text that was projected fit into the liturgy in a seamless way, so that it didn’t distract from worship. The screen just doesn’t seem conducive to projecting more than a line or two of readable text.

One exception was the use of projection for worship at General Convention this summer. However, text was rarely projected. The projectors were mainly used to display a reredos (don’t be impressed – I had to look it up!): imagery/decoration behind that altar that reinforced the liturgy. The images were intentional, symbolic reflections of the theme for the week. You can find an image if how it was incorporated at http://imageandspirit.blogspot.com/2009/07/ubuntu-reredos.html

Donald K. Vinson said...

from Stan Holmes...
I have found that if I can catch newcomers before the worship begins to suggest they not even try to "keep up." My experience is if they try to keep up regardless of whether it's out of the BCP or a photcopy they get lost and the power of the word spoken goes right over their heads. Why not invite them to experience the worship by simply hearing it for the first few times? "Faith come from hearing and hearing from the word of God." Our liturgy is powerful but not so if your expected to jump on in. Just a thought. Stan <><

Donald K. Vinson said...

from Hal Foss...
I have been in an Episcopal church where this was done. After you get over the shock, it's great. No fumbling around for books; not need to keep consulting the bulletin to see which song or find the words for the lessons; no need to look down for words to songs. It really aided the flow of the service. Of course this was a modern church filled with hip young parishioners, right? No, it was an a very traditional church, that is so conservative theologically it is moving to the Anglican church. All it took was the courage to hang a large screen off to one side of the altar, and a projector overhead where it was hardly noticed. Why so many look down their noses at new technology is a mystery to me, when it can add so much for so many.

Hal